The D.C. Circuit's Mixed Decision on Net Neutrality

JONES DAY TALKS®: The D.C. Circuit’s Mixed Decision on Net Neutrality



Legal and regulatory battles continue over net neutrality, the concept that all internet traffic should be treated equally.

In Mozilla v. Federal Communications Commission, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld the Commission’s deregulatory approach to net neutrality but also struck down an order blocking states from implementing their own rules.

Jones Day partner Brett Shumate explains what the court’s decision could mean for net neutrality moving forward.


Signed into law by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, the Fair Pay to Play Act will allow college athletes in that state to accept payment for the use of their name, image, and likeness. In response, the NCAA has threatened to bar colleges from postseason tournaments if they allow players to profit under the new law's provisions, and several athletic conferences have also voiced opposition. Still, a number of states are already considering legislation similar to that enacted in California. Jones Day's Marc Weinroth, Ilene Tannen, and Brett Shumate discuss the probable implications of the Fair Pay to Play Act.

JONES DAY TALKS®: Game Changer? California’s Fair Pay to Play Act and the Future of College Sports



Signed into law by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, the Fair Pay to Play Act will allow college athletes in that state to accept payment for the use of their name, image, and likeness. In response, the NCAA has threatened to bar colleges from postseason tournaments if they allow players to profit under the new law’s provisions, and several athletic conferences have also voiced opposition. Still, a number of states are already considering legislation similar to that enacted in California.

Jones Day’s Marc WeinrothIlene Tannen, and Brett Shumate discuss the probable implications of the Fair Pay to Play Act.


JONES DAY TALKS®: Game Over? Alston and the Future of Pay-for-Play in College Sports – ENCORE PRESENTATION



In this Encore Presentation: JONES DAY TALKS® podcast on what has become known as the Alston or Jenkins case, a California district judge has issued a 104-page order in In re: NCAA Grant-in-Aid Cap Antitrust Litigation. The matter focused on NCAA rules that prohibit schools from offering certain forms of compensation to student-athletes. Jones Day’s Chris Pace and Marc Weinroth talk about the Alston decision and what it could mean for college sports programs.


JONES DAY TALKS®: Helms-Burton Risks Continue for Companies with Investments and Operations in Cuba



The uncertainty continues for companies potentially at risk since the Trump Administration lifted the suspension on Title III of the Helms-Burton Act, a provision that empowers U.S. nationals with claims to confiscated property in Cuba to file suit in U.S. courts against entities “trafficking” in those assets.

Rick Puente and Chris Pace review recent case developments, discuss the appointment of new National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien, and talk about what parties possibly affected by Helms-Burton should expect next.


Scandalous Matter at Supreme Court

Women in IP: Reviewing a “Scandalous Matter” at the Supreme Court



The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Mission Product Holdings v. Tempnology, LLC  holds interesting implications for both trademark law and bankruptcy law. Also, in Iancu v. Brunetti, the Court confirmed that trademarks cannot be refused registration on the basis that they constitute “immoral” or “scandalous” matter. Meredith Wilkes, Jennifer Swize, and Anna Raimer review the ramifications of these decisions and preview two additional trademark cases the Court will hear next session.


Managing Multijurisdictional M&A

Jones Day Talks: Managing Multijurisdictional M&A – ENCORE PRESENTATION



In this Encore Presentation: Jones Day Talks podcast on foreign direct investment, Randi Lesnick and Chase Kaniecki discuss the current global M&A landscape, the challenges of multijurisdictional deal making, the impact of geopolitical issues, and why investors can benefit from contingency planning.


France's FDI Regulations Target Sensitive Industries

France’s FDI Regulations Target Sensitive Industries



France remains a vibrant market for investors. But as is the case in many countries, France is establishing regulations to oversee and control foreign investment in certain industries and sectors. Jones Day’s Audrey Bontemps, Nicolas Brice, and Chase Kaniecki talk about the country’s foreign direct investment regulations and explain how parties to possible transactions subject to these rules should proceed.


Jones Day Talks: Italy Embraces Foreign investment but Maintains Oversight



Italy is ranked one of the top destinations for investment in the European union. Still, the Italian government wields the authority to review, and even prevent, investments by foreign entities seeking assets in certain sectors and industries.

Jones Day’s Stefano Crosio and Chase Kaniecki talk about recent developments in Italy’s foreign direct investment regulations and discuss strategic considerations for parties to potential transactions.


Oversight of Foreign Direct Investment in the UK

Jones Day Talks: Oversight of Foreign Direct Investment in the UK



The United Kingdom is taking a careful look at potential direct investments by foreign entities. While the UK certainly works hard to attract investor interest, concerns relating to certain sectors can trigger government scrutiny and oversight.

Jones Day’s Matt Evans and Chase Kaniecki discuss the U.K.’s review process, the role of the Competition and Markets Authority, the sectors subject to examination, and the importance of “managing the message.”


EU's New Foreign Direct Investment Regulations Eye Specific Sectors

EU’s New Foreign Direct Investment Regulations Eye Specific Sectors



In step with a global trend, the European Union has enacted a framework, effective October 11, 2020, for screening foreign direct investment into EU states.

Jones Day’s Renato Antonini, Eva Monard, and Chase Kaniecki discuss the industries and sectors affected, the impact on investment deal flow, and other likely effects of the new EU-wide provisions.