Tag Archives: Supreme Court

JONES DAY TALKS®: Consumer Protection Enforcement Changes Likely After SCOTUS AMG Decision

September 23, 2021Government Regulation, Litigation, Supreme CourtAMG Capital Management v. FTC, Consumer Protection, DOJ, FTC, FTC Act, Section 13(b), Section 5(a), Supreme Courtjonesdaytalks

In AMG Capital Management v. FTC, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the Federal Trade Commission Act does not allow the FTC to seek, from violators of the Act, “equitable monetary relief” in the form of restitution or disgorgement.

Jones Day partner David Morrell talks about how the Court’s decision could alter the FTC’s consumer-protection enforcement actions moving forward, the Justice Department’s newly prominent role in these matters, and what potentially affected parties should know.

Read the full transcript on the Jones Day website.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: RSS

JONES DAY TALKS®: Supreme Court Rules on Constitutionality of Administrative Patent Judges

July 20, 2021Intellectual Property, Litigation, Supreme CourtAPJ, Arthex, Intellectual Property, PTAB, Supreme Courtjonesdaytalks

The United States Supreme Court has delivered its decision in U.S. v. Arthrex, which determined whether appointments of administrative patent judges to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) were constitutional.

Jones Day’s Matt Johnson and John Evans talk about the background of the Arthrex case, how the decision could affect the way the PTAB operates, and the implications for parties with matters pending.

Read the full transcript on the Jones Day website.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: RSS

JONES DAY TALKS®: Alston, the NCAA, and the Future of College Sports

July 19, 2021Antitrust, LitigationAlston, Antitrust, Kavanaugh, NCAA, O'Bannon v. NCAA, Supreme Courtjonesdaytalks

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled 9-0 in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston that the NCAA violated antitrust law by prohibiting member colleges from providing athletes with certain educational benefits. Specifically, the case dealt with the NCAA’s restrictions on providing athletes with non-cash, academic-related compensation, such as computers and internships.

Jones Day’s Chris Pace and Marc Weinroth discuss the Alston decision and its possible long-term implications for college sports.

Read the full transcript on the Jones Day website.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: RSS

JONES DAY TALKS®: U.S. Supreme Court Hears Arguments in NCAA Antitrust Case

April 5, 2021Antitrust, LitigationAlito, amateurism, Antitrust, Brett Kavanaugh, March Madness, NCAA, NCAA v. Alston, Ninth Circuit, Supreme Courtjonesdaytalks

The U.S. Supreme Court has heard oral arguments in NCAA v. Alston, a case that will determine the limits the NCAA can place on types of compensation received by college student-athletes.

Jones Day’s Chris Pace and Marc Weinroth discuss how the case found its way to the Supreme Court, the arguments that the NCAA and student-athletes made, and what this case could mean for the future of college athletics.

Read a full transcript on the Jones Day website.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: RSS